| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1495
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 11:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
Some blink have reacted to being told to cease their RMT activity by offering even more credit per purchase. This is beyond taking the ****. The 10 days was to give them time to take down their operation, not to have 10 days to push a bigger marketing campaign. This is clearly Somer acting in defiance against the ruling that has been made and a clear indicator that they should be shut down immediately. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1498
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 11:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Or maybe its time to take advantage  Sure. If you are selfish, and you support a group that couldn't give two ***** about this game, then yes, you could take advantage. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1500
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 11:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Or maybe its time to take advantage  Sure. If you are selfish, and you support a group that couldn't give two ***** about this game, then yes, you could take advantage. To be honest with the way Eve is going why the hell not  Was it a big FU to CCP, of course it was, but since CCP apparently seem more interested in their side projects then Eve itself these days.. sod it  Why the hell not? Because I love EVE, and I'm passionate about it going in a positive direction. Sure, it's got it's ups and downs, and lately there have been quite a few problems, but that doesn't mean I want to help make those problems worse. I never have supported Somer, and this latest debacle only strengthens my resolve that removing them from the community is the right thing to do for the future of the game. People need to be told that this will not stand. People that look positively on the community and aren't in it to line their pockets are the ones that should be supported. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1506
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 11:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tron 3K wrote:Hmm anyone have a link to where CCP said this is wrong and gave them a grace period? As far as I know this was sent to the GTC resellers, and they are tasked with enforcing it as part of the resellers rules. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1514
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 12:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Oh for the love of god, when will you people stop complaining?
CCP has set a strict deadline. 10 days and then all incentives and rewards in return for the use of affiliate links are to be gone. That's it. Until then anyone is free to do whatever they like. Taking advantage of the time you have left is not rocket science, any reasonably smart person would do this. See the Amazon mess up, people took massive advantage of that because they knew it could end at any minute. The 10 days is not given so they can make as much as they can. It's given so that they have time to make the technical changes to stop. They are simply showing they have the ability to stop at any time, but want to push sales.
And I'll stop complaining when Somer are either shut down or they start looking out for the best interests of the community and not lining their pockets.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1520
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 13:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Yeah because god forbid someone has a good idea and makes more money than the average Joe  . Whether or not they need the money for server upkeep, I think SOMER had a good thing going and in a troubled economy like today that's something I like to encourage. Let me spell it out for you; some random dude or dudette found a loophole in the game's rules and stands to make over half a million dollars from it. That's genius. That's real money. You people are acting like this is somehow hurting your real life. Are you being fired from your job because of SOMER? Are you forced to embrace SOMER and buy weekly PLEXes to keep your car running? Or did SOMER sell you a ridiculously high mortgage which you are bending over backwards to pay? Is SOMER spying on all your internet activity and phone calls and selling the information to make the money they are earning? Did SOMER break into your house and steal your first borne child? Nope, SOMER hasn't done any of that. What this is and has been from the start is one big collective "WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" because people can't STAND the idea of someone out-smarting them financially. First it was jealousy because they make tons of ISK. Then it was jealousy because they make tons of real money. Show me one person who's real life was negatively affected by SOMER because they made some money? Are you going to protest the local grocery store because they are making money? So what you are basically saying is that you are fine with a group making real money by exploiting the rules of the game and performing RMT? Good for you. However luckily for those of us that actually like EVE, RMT is against the rules. Finding a loophole then exploiting it is not a good thing. Furthering that by accelerating the use of that loophole when told to stop is even worse. I really don't give a **** if you think they are smart for making money, it's against the rules and they should be punished. They are a business running a game account to exploit the real players for cash.
And nobody here except you is saying anything about real life problems, we are stating that it's bad for THE GAME. You know? EVE Online? It's an MMORPG that many of us actually like and would like to see continue fairly?
Moron... Go back to the Somer chatroom and whine there. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1521
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 13:16:00 -
[7] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:One of the more expensive comparies Host gator server and cost
Intel Xeon Quad Core, 3.3GHz (8 threads) 1 Gbps Uplink 16 GB High Performance RAM 1,000 GB RAID-1 Drives 25 TB Bandwidth 5 Dedicated IPs WebMatrix Ready!
$299.00 a month
This is well over what they would need for a server and only $3600 a year
So how about we don't try the boo hoo about sever cost as they have already made over $135,000 from this community. Yeah, that's pretty overkill. Their site is hardly complex. I have development servers put together from scraps that could easily run their site to be honest. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1523
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 13:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Ah yes, but it wasn't actually against any rules until CCP changed those same rules. If you want to believe the skewed rationalizations posted around the forums then feel free to do so. But the fact is that is that up until a few days ago, what SOMER was doing was perfectly legal within the EULA and the reseller agreement. And you can't punish someone for doing something that is legal. Simple as that. Well no, RMT was always against the rules. The only question was "is what Somer doing RMT" and the answer is a resounding yes. The fact that they got away with it for so long doesn't mean the rule didn't exist. So yes, they can be punished.
Not to mention that as they run it to make money, that means their accounts are being used for business purposes, which is a second rule violation.
This latest is them try to grab as much from their RMT before they are completely forced to stop. CCP gave them 10 days as a gesture of goodwill, as not all sites are that easy to get updated swiftly, depending on time allowances. But rather than do what all the other sites did and stop ASAP, they've chosen to purposely run a firesale instead. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1526
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 13:40:00 -
[9] - Quote
Gavinvin1337 wrote:Why is everyone hating on Somer?
I don't see what they have done wrong, they were given prizes from CCP and gifted ships from CCP, should they have refused them?
Everything that has gone wrong here is CCP's fault, you guys are just jealous the Somer came up with a good idea before you did. Uhhh nobody is talking about their ships. You realise they've been RMTing right? That's what most of these threads are about. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1526
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 13:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
embrel wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Somer blink have reacted to being told to cease their RMT activity by offering even more credit per purchase. This is beyond taking the ****. The 10 days was to give them time to take down their operation, not to have 10 days to push a bigger marketing campaign. This is clearly Somer acting in defiance against the ruling that has been made and a clear indicator that they should be shut down immediately. isn't that completely in the spirit of EVE? the issue is being resolved. the reaction, while not classy, seems kinda rational. The reaction is expected sure, but utterly disgraceful nonetheless. And as I say, the 10 days is to give them time to stop it. We know they could have by now but they chose instead to accelerate it. They want to make as much dollar as they can before they are forced to obey the rules. That's like knowing an exploit is going to be patched next week, so using it as much as possible until then. Bannable. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1534
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:06:00 -
[11] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Now we have Somer doing the same, just in a more round about manner.
Hm, you'd think CCP would keep a close eye on stuff like this. Maybe check their website, play a few Blinks? Certainly before writing a spotlight about them and giving them tons of goodies to give away. So yeah I think it's pretty safe to assume CCP had a very clear understanding of the setup Somer uses. I refuse to believe that not a single CCP employee ever visited their website and not noticed the credit for GTC thing. By extension that also means CCP didn't mind and thus approved their setup. And THAT by extension means that Somer's entire thing was legal or at the very least not illegal. It's really not rocket science. You can then rage at CCP for showing favoritism and stuff, but don't blame Somer for something CCP did or didn't. They got the OK from CCP and carried on like normal. If you want to rage at someone, rage at CCP. Bull. Someone not being punished for something doesn't mean that they have permission to do it. CCP probably didn't consider it in depth. It was only once they put Somer into the spotlight and people started looking at what they were doing that it came to light. The fact that CCP have issued letters to the GTC resellers yet not changed any rules shows that it was always against the rules. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1534
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:08:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jythier Smith wrote:I don't see the problem here.
They were doing a legal thing.
CCP changed the rules and now it's not legal.
Suddenly, they have a bunch of worthless stock (ISK).
So they are trying to sell it at cut-rate prices so they recoup their investment. Just like any business.
Say you bought 10 cars to sell, and then someone tells you you won't be able to sell those cars in 10 days - you would sell them as cheap as you could to get your money back.
Now, given that what they were doing was really close to being illegal, and probably was against the spirit of the rules, this should have been shut down a long time ago with bans instead of being given in-game items for it. But it wasn't, it was allowed, so now we have to allow them 10 days to get their business in order again, which may include getting rid of as much ISK as they can to convert to real money. The problem is your second line. It was never legal. The other problem is what you have stated "Just like any business". EVE accounts are for personal use, not to be run a s business.
And the 10 days was a goodwill gesture from CCP to give them a fair amount of time to update their site. It was not so they could firesale their isk into huge amounts of profit. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1541
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
Those of you considering buying a GTC from them by the way, first consider that there's no guarantee they will actually pay you out, since they are likely going out of business and secondly think about the type of people you are supporting. If you need to buy a GTC, the best thing you can do is pick a community site doing things that are actually good for the community, not trying to generate huge volumes of income, and buy a GTC though their affiliate link. I'm not going to name any as I don't want a debate over who does what for who.
Support EVE, don't support RMT empires. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1545
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:44:00 -
[14] - Quote
oOReikaOo Michiko wrote:They got what they want and i made out like a bandit too..
Like you didnt jump on the amazon mistake? lmao ... strike while iron is hot i always say Would you also loot shops when there's a riot going on? No security, window's already broken... Strike while the iron is hot an all that...
Or an old lady falls asleep on the bus, and a few notes are lying half out of her purse. Take them right? The iron is hot!
Being able to do something and profit doesn't automatically make it the right thing to do. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1550
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:52:00 -
[15] - Quote
oOReikaOo Michiko wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:oOReikaOo Michiko wrote:They got what they want and i made out like a bandit too..
Like you didnt jump on the amazon mistake? lmao ... strike while iron is hot i always say Would you also loot shops when there's a riot going on? No security, window's already broken... Strike while the iron is hot an all that... Or an old lady falls asleep on the bus, and a few notes are lying half out of her purse. Take them right? The iron is hot! Being able to do something and profit doesn't automatically make it the right thing to do. Did you just quote morals, on eve? something ive been getting **** for for like 2 weeks? Morals are always there, even in EVE. Sure, they don't apply to things like blowing up peoples stuff, it's a game, and that's what happens in this game. But the rules are the rules, and you stick to them even when they don't suit you. That's just the way it is. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1550
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
YesYes NoNoNo wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:For all we know CCP is working side by side with SOMER on this 1 billion credits per plex. When was the last time you heard of an ISK seller being given 10 days to stop? Coupled with the complete silence on CCP's side - it's pretty obvious. Somer's said before that he talks to CCP before doing this sort of thing / checked with them before doing the 1b thing. Yet they won't talk to us.... Somer has actually tweeted that he/she has been talking to CCP on skype.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1550
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
oOReikaOo Michiko wrote:Way over the line buddy Yeah, that one's a bit far. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1558
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:57:00 -
[18] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Being able to do something and profit doesn't automatically make it the right thing to do. True, but there's no need to take it into real life. The iron is also "hot" when you spot a Condor flying about with 30 PLEX in his cargo hold, or when someone puts an extra digit on a contract or market order. It all depends on your perspective and which situational ethics you apply. Don't go quite too heavy on the ethical judgment there. There's a different between what you do in game, where the rules are designed for you to be able to fight, and steal from each other. A pickpocket ability in a game is not morally wrong, as the game is designed to have that. RMT is against the rules, so supporting RMT is wrong, even if you profit from it. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1558
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:58:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jythier Smith wrote:If it already was illegal, then why wasn't it stopped? Why did the rules have to change?
I'm just too new to care about Somer Blink at all. Only hear about it in articles I've been reading to get to know EVE better. Turns out there are a bunch of morons playing EVE who really want to gamble... well, just undock your ships and you're gambling already.
Who didn't know what Somer Blink was doing that they were 'exposed'? Other affiliates were also doing similar things. They had to change the policy to make it illegal. When you change a policy, you don't get to go back and ban someone for breaking that policy in the past, and you give time to allow people to match the new policy. If you don't, you're a bad business partner.
Whether it should have been legal or not is a different answer, of course. Of course it should have been against the rules and CCP should have been enforcing it that way, but they chose to interpret their policy as allowing it, which is their right to do. The didn't change the policy though, they simply put the onus on the GTC resellers to enforce the rules which were not being enforced.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1558
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:59:00 -
[20] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:YesYes NoNoNo wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:For all we know CCP is working side by side with SOMER on this 1 billion credits per plex. When was the last time you heard of an ISK seller being given 10 days to stop? Coupled with the complete silence on CCP's side - it's pretty obvious. Somer's said before that he talks to CCP before doing this sort of thing / checked with them before doing the 1b thing. Yet they won't talk to us.... Somer has actually tweeted that he/she has been talking to CCP on skype. Outrage! Favoritism! This should not be possible! It's all one big conspiracy I tell you!  lol, not quite. I just mean it shows that CCP are not being entirely silent, just silent to the community. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1558
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 15:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
Jythier Smith wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Jythier Smith wrote:If it already was illegal, then why wasn't it stopped? Why did the rules have to change?
I'm just too new to care about Somer Blink at all. Only hear about it in articles I've been reading to get to know EVE better. Turns out there are a bunch of morons playing EVE who really want to gamble... well, just undock your ships and you're gambling already.
Who didn't know what Somer Blink was doing that they were 'exposed'? Other affiliates were also doing similar things. They had to change the policy to make it illegal. When you change a policy, you don't get to go back and ban someone for breaking that policy in the past, and you give time to allow people to match the new policy. If you don't, you're a bad business partner.
Whether it should have been legal or not is a different answer, of course. Of course it should have been against the rules and CCP should have been enforcing it that way, but they chose to interpret their policy as allowing it, which is their right to do. The didn't change the policy though, they simply put the onus on the GTC resellers to enforce the rules which were not being enforced. They changed their interpretation of it, which is effectively the same thing. Well no, it's not. And as far as I know it wasn't even the interpretation that they changed. They simply hadn't explicitly stated to the resellers that the EULA applied to the reseller rules too. Now they have. So everyone has to stop. But Somer haven't they are RMTing as much as they can before they stop. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1563
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 15:30:00 -
[22] - Quote
Gavinvin1337 wrote:Tron 3K wrote:Gavinvin1337 wrote:Why is everyone hating on Somer?
I don't see what they have done wrong, they were given prizes from CCP and gifted ships from CCP, should they have refused them?
Everything that has gone wrong here is CCP's fault, you guys are just jealous the Somer came up with a good idea before you did. I'd agree to it if it wasn't an idea breaking the rules. Unlike SOMER some of us actually follow the rules. Somer's been in operation for years. Isn't is funny that once CCP give them some shiny ships all of a sudden everyone 'realises' that what they have been doing is RMT and 'breaking the rules'. I'm sure CCP are really happy that you have figured out a player run organisation that's been doing the same thing for years is actually breaking the rules. The items situation only called for Somer to be looked at more closely. It's when we began to look more closely that we realised what they were doing. Obviously Somer players are the ones with the most exposure to Somer so they may have noticed it and not said much. But when those of us that do not play Somer are suddenly told they are some beacon of the community, sure, it makes us pay attention. This rule should have been enforced from day 1, but it wasn't and that's now fixed. But Somer pushing sales even harder is clearly not the right thing to do. All of the other site that had incentives have immediately packed up, as they should. Somer instead chose to make a last effort to make as much cash as possible. That shows they have no respect for the rules and no respect for the community. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1563
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 15:42:00 -
[23] - Quote
Pak Narhoo wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:Vera Algaert wrote:Sometimes the symbolic value of an act is all that really matters. If you don't remember Dianabolic's posts in the context of this thread then you will of course not realize the significance of bragging about having CCP employees on your IM. Aaaaaaand the T20 link is made. Way to cover your bases CCP. Damn, really wanted to read that devblog but like so many others (the $1000 pants one) it got "missing". What was it again "the winners will write the past"? It's here: http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/ia-investigation-update-three-investigations-concluded/
It's not "missing". Seriously, learn to search.
If you tell me roughly when the $1000 pants was an a brief idea of what it was about (or a link to a thread) I'll find you the devblog.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1563
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 15:45:00 -
[24] - Quote
MetaMorpheus Jones wrote:Kamii Yo wrote:you make me sick CCP. You, and ppl like you, make me sick. For all the HTFU and WOW is that way crap that gets spewed on this forum, never have I seen such a collection of entitled, self-important whiners. For the vast majority of Eve players, this SomerBLINK nonsense has exactly ZERO impact on their game. Please, CCP, don't mistake the forum pussies for the Eve player base. Most of us could care less. Yep we're entitled. We're entitled to a fair enforcement of the rules. Honestly, a lot of us would happily RMT our stuff if it was legal. So CCP had a decision to make. enforce the rule against this form of RMT or allow us all to do it. They chose to enforce their rules. So that's that.
By the way, are you a Somer shill or a butthurt Somer user? The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1573
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 16:13:00 -
[25] - Quote
MetaMorpheus Jones wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:
Honestly, a lot of us would happily RMT our stuff if it was legal. So CCP had a decision to make. enforce the rule against this form of RMT or allow us all to do it. They chose to enforce their rules. So that's that.
By the way, are you a Somer shill or a butthurt Somer user?
Read the EULA, Genius. It isn't your stuff. It never was your stuff. As for SomerBLINK, however screwed up the arrangement became, in the end, I believe CCP saw SomerBLINK GTC sales as another way to get and keep players in the game, another way to promote Eve Online. Was it haphazard and ill-thought out? yea, a lot of it was. And in the end, CCP changed their policy. End of story. But my god, users of this forum want this to be fricken' Watergate. Give me a break. As for being a Somer shill, I've never played SB, I've never bought GTC or anything else from them, and I generally consider gambling as a way to part fools from their money (or ISK, as the case may be.) I could care less if they vanished into thin air. I'm just bloody tired of the bitching and moaning, the tin-foil hattery, the absurd accusations and ideations of conspiracy and back-room deals. Could CCP have handles this better? yea, probably. Could the community have reacted with a little more maturity and a little less self-entitlement? Judging by this and nearly ever other issue facing Eve players, probably not. That such a thing is true doesn't make it any less pathetic. It's only pathetic to you because you don't care about the matter. I in fact do care, because I like EVE and dislike people breaking the rules and taking the ****. Look at the reaction of Somer and the **** they are spewing in their in game channel, and it's clear they are not a good community site. Thankfully, because they are all about the dollar, come the 7th, they will be looking to do a final cash out and we can be done with them. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1577
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 16:34:00 -
[26] - Quote
MetaMorpheus Jones wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:
Its like CCP always assumes that the forums are just spamming bullsh!t and try to silence the minority by placation.
And where on earth could they possibly have gotten such an idea from? The vast majority of the forums, in particular GD, is just spamming bullsh!t. People whining about the game and/or the players, and trolls trolling them. Maybe one thread in 20 is actually worth a read. Again though, your opinion. I see a lot of threads with legitimate concerns that could easily be answered by a CCP rep and settled without issue. But they chose to ignore them, then the trolls get on board and start telling people they are "self-entitled" and "whiners", and "pussies" and saying they are spwewing crap. That's when things take a turn for the worse.
Come to think of it, these words... I've seen them before recently. Oh yeah: Here Written by... oh right yeah, it was written by you. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1578
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 17:01:00 -
[27] - Quote
MetaMorpheus Jones wrote:If the shoe fits, babycakes . . .
This subject took a turn for the worse long, long before I commented on them. The fact is that players of your ilk have been crying and whining about "unfair" and "favoritism" and all sorts of nonsense from the moment this issue broke the surface. It is not enough that CCP reversed their decision on the "special" ships for Somer's EveVEGAS activities, it is not enough that CCP decided to curtail the GTC bonuses, it is not enough that SomerBLINK can no longer conduct business as they have been used to doing, and in fact, the forum warriors see the fact that CCP gave the affiliates 10 days to comply is further evidence of collusion and conspiracy.
Pathetic. We are simply calling out what we see. Somer making a mint while shitting on the community. And the complaint ish that the 10 days look suspect. The 10 days was given to give time to adhere to the rules. If Somer had done nothing for the 10 days, that would be fine. But it's that they clearly could abide by the rules now, but instead they've chosen to RMT like crazy before they run out of time. That's what we don't like. All the other sites did the right thing by packing it in as soon as they could.
Seriously though, if you're not a Somer shill, why troll so hard? Why not just **** off if you've got nothing constructive to add?
Oh yeah, because of poor precious Somer needs protecting from us, the evil community that hates RMT. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1667
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 16:58:00 -
[28] - Quote
MyEveLotto wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Interesting how they are still tracking purchases for 'future promotions'.
Kind of like saying "Keep buying your stuff through us and maybe we'll find a way to give you stuff in the future."
Gotta give Somer points for creativity when it comes to walking the fine line of the rules. You know, the cease and desist only says they can't provide ISK/in-game item rewards for purchasing GTCs. It doesn't say that they can't provide out-of-game rewards for purchasing GTCs. So all they have to do is create a new Blink or Bonk and only allow people who have purchased GTCs in the last month to participate in the chance to win some massive prize. Then, you're not giving people ISK for GTCs, you're just giving them access to an exclusive part of the website as "thanks". There you go, SOMER. That's your new method for [redacted]. How soon can we expect to see it implemented? Or you can implement my other suggestion: http://myevelotto.com/blinkJust trying to help a fellow lottery host. The reward for that special part of the game would have to be an out of game reward. If you had a GTC exclusive area, which allowed you to then goi on to win special isk and in-game items, it would clearly be a way around the ruling and therefore bannable. Remember, this is not an automated system that you have to trick, and it's not a law where you can find legal loopholes. CCP have the full rights to shut you down for any reason, or even no reason if they want. All in game items are their property, and Somer can't claim against them if CCP chose to ban their accounts. So doing something that can obviously be seen as a way of sidestepping the rules would not end well. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1668
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 17:20:00 -
[29] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:A thread full of gamblers complaining that the people they give their ISK to are bad and need to be banned. Has it occurred to any of you that if you could get your habit under control, you would have no reason to complain about Somer since they would have folded a long time ago? Blaming others for your own failing is not a new strategy and entirely expected. But until you come to terms with your addiction, you will be the fools and sites like Somer will be the people taking advantage of you. Mr Epeen  I'm not a gambler.
MyEveLotto wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:So doing something that can obviously be seen as a way of sidestepping the rules would not end well. Don't know about that. The first time they did something that can obviously be seen as a way of sidestepping the rules, CCP gave them 10 days to cash out as much as they could... Sort of. CCP gave everyone 10 days grace time to get their sites in order. Somer just chose to accelerate it. While I don't agree, I can understand why CCP let that one slide, since it both made them more profit, and would have been a lot of hassle to go back on the 10 days. I imagine further deliberate breaches of the rules would result in swift action, and if it didn't it would certainly result in me posting a ticket and a forum thread every 10 minutes until an official made a statement. They would have to ban me to make me shut up, then that would be that.
I actually think I want to be banned, since it would force me to actually get a bit more of my life back :p |
| |
|